SoonerBlue

Mostly politics, a few current events, a squirt of seltzer down yer pants .. a little blog for my rambles and rants.

2009/9/30

Roman Polanski is scum!

Tags:
@ 07:33 AM (1 month, 22 days ago)

 

I don't care how artistic you are, or that you hung out with Jack Nicholson, or what a swell guy your friends say you are, or that you had a tough childhood -- you drugged and raped a 13 y/o child, Roman Polanski! A little girl, who even in her drugged state, said "No."

You admitted the rape, said you were guilty, and then fled the country before you could be sentenced. Why should you be treated any differently than any other child rapist? Because you make movies? Hah! Child rape is still child rape.

And I wonder if you've done it again, but been able to cover it up. Pedophiles, men who like little girls, usually don't stop at one.

It pisses me off that you managed to escape arrest for 32 years, and that my government somehow let you get away with it.

It pisses me off that you continued to work as a director, even winning an Oscar...that you got to live the good life in multiple homes in Europe with your new family. You raped a child. Period.

I don't care that your victim's mother brought her to you at Jack Nicholson's house all those years ago...that's another sordid story.

I don't care that your 40 y/o victim doesn't want you punished today. It's easy to understand her dread of being caught in the middle of a media circus that could turn out to be as ugly as the rape itself.

But this is not the victim vs. Polanski, it's the State of California vs. Polanski, and it has to play out to finally put an end to it.

And now your friends are signing petitions and trying to paint you as the victim! Boohoo. It is hardly a "miscarriage of justice" to bring you back to finish the procedure you pled guilty to.

Thirty years ago you plied a child with alcohol and Quaaludes, forcibly raped her and then ran from justice...I hope they throw the book at you Roman Polanski!

 

2009/9/29

"Obama played Iran perfectly"

Tags:
@ 09:02 PM (1 month, 23 days ago)

 

Ahmadinejad's jittery craziness is the perfect foil to what Gordon Goldstein calls Obama's "greatest qualities as president"..."his quality of mind and his quality of judgment -- his dispassionate ability to analyze a situation." 

We'll have to wait and see if Americans can appreciate a thoughtful and patient President over a knee-jerk reactive cowboy one.

From washingtontimes.com: "[M]r. Obama's disclosure Friday that Iran had a secret nuclear facility and that he had known about it since taking office introduced a new way of looking at many of his decisions since January.

"You have to go back and look at the nine months and all the moves he's made since then, and that he knew Iran was lying to him, and he still went ahead with it," said Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, a Washington advocacy group devoted to eliminating nuclear weapons from the world.

"He played Iran perfectly, to isolate Iran, unite all the other countries around him, with an open hand to Iran, and then he springs the trap."

Not only did the president look strong, he looked cunning. [..]"

It is refreshing to see Obama handle the 'Iranian' problem this way....after eight years of "cowboyism."

I find his slow and thoughtful approach to these challenging problems remarkable. His bringing the Russians on board by agreeing to move Bush's  missile shield out of Eastern Europe was brilliant.

The neo-cons played checkers...Obama plays chess.

 

Beware, Blue Dog Democrats!

 

Okay, the Jewish holiday Yom Kippur is over, Congress is coming back to work on healthcare reform.

House Democrats are trying to combine three different bills proposed by three different committees. Leaders say they hope to send a final bill to the Congressional Budget Office by the end of the week.

The Senate's Finance Committee will try to complete its bill by the end of the week...then start debating early next week about whether it should include a public insurance option. Let's hope it takes center stage.

The latest polls show that a majority of Americans want a public option. Are you listening Blue Dogs? If we don't re-elect you, all that campaign money from the health industry won't mean a thing.

Any thinking person can see that a public option would drive down the cost of private insurance. Surprise -- the insurance industry opposes it...they say lower-priced competition would put private insurance companies out of business.

Well, it might reduce some of their bonuses...but, out of business, no.

Profiteers should not manage or run healthcare. It's safe to say that the dysfunctional healthcare system we have now knocks off a lot more people than a whole army of "death panels."

Instead of 'public option' let's just call it a public insurance plan...one that essentially asks people if they would like the option - the voluntary option - of buying into Medicare before they're 65?

I keep thinking of a single mother I know, a waitress, who wants the choice of a public option because the health insurance premiums for her 14 y/o daughter have gone up to $300 a month.

Why can't anyone see that private insurance companies would have to be more reasonable if they had to compete with a public insurance plan? That's why they're fighting reform tooth and nail, pouring so much money into TV ads and tea parties -- they don't want to give up those bloated profits and CEO salaries.

BTW-- Here is a list of 23 health companies I found on Forbes.com, showing what the CEO was paid in 2005, and the average paid to the CEO in the past five years:

United Health Group
CEO: William W McGuire
2005: 124.8 mil
5-year: 342 mil

Forest Labs
CEO: Howard Solomon
2005: 92.1 mil
5-year: 295 mil

Caremark Rx
CEO: Edwin M Crawford
2005: 77.9 mil
5-year: 93.6 mil

Abbott Lab
CEO: Miles White
2005: 26.2 mil
5-year: 25.8 mil

Aetna
CEO: John Rowe
2005: 22.1 mil
5-year:57.8 mil

[..]

TOTAL 2005: 559.8 mil............TOTAL 5-Year: 14.9 billion

Goodness, think about how many millions of Americans we could provide healthcare for with all that CEO compensation.

Righties are going to love this

 

81 year-old pop singer Andy Williams is trashing President Obama.

You know how conservatives are always saying that Hollywood entertainers should just keep their politics to themselves? Well, crooner Andy Williams is publicly accusing Barack Obama of "following Marxist theory" and "wanting the country to fail."

Et tu, Andy? Now go over there and stand with Jon Voight and Chuck Norris.

What do you want to bet that righties will applaud and cheer Andy for his astute observations?

But let Barbra Streisand speak her political mind...or Cher, or Susan Sarandon...or the Dixie Chicks, or Tim Robbins, or George Clooney, or ... well. You get the picture.

Read about Andy's remarks here.

"Veteran crooner Andy Williams has criticized Barack Obama, accusing the US President of "following Marxist theory" and "wanting the country to fail".

Williams, a lifelong Republican, told the Radio Times he thought President Obama wanted to turn the US into a "socialist country".[..]"

My first reaction when I read this was, "Wow, Andy Williams is still alive?"


 

2009/9/28

Speaking in tongues for our glorious leader

 

A YouTube video of some New Jersey school children singing praises for President Obama recently made the rounds...caused quite a flap.

Some people said the teacher was trying to indoctrinate the children...some people said the teacher merely wanted to "engage the children in an activity to recognize famous and accomplished African Americans." After all, it was Black History month.

Just for the record, I am with the conservatives on this one. I truly think that partisan politics and religion should be kept out of the classroom...unless it's a civics or history class.

But I have to share the following video of true reverence for The Head Of State...where they worship a cardboard cut-out Bush at Jesus Camp.

Talk about indoctrinating little children...

Yes, I do know the difference between a public classroom and church camp...I just thought it amusing, especially the speaking in tongues part.

Now I better understand Bush's problems with vocabulary.


 

2009/9/27

Teabaggers DO NOT speak for majority of Americans

With all that hell that Glenn Beck and his teabaggers raised this summer, all that rude hollering and screaming people down at town hall meetings, all that hysteria that wingnuts use instead of debate, it looks like they still haven't won over the American people to their side.

A new CBS/NYTimes poll shows that 65 percent of Americas want a public option...they favor a government healthcare plan like Medicare that would compete with private insurance companies.

That's a substantial amount...and it only goes to show that, for all their hysterical temper tantrums, all their swaggering around with loaded guns and hateful signs, the tea party protesters do NOT represent the American people like their Mad Hatter Beck claims. They represent a mere 26 percent...a very small minority of public opinion.

Blue Dog Dems need to get it through their heads that the public option is popular and not all that politically risky. Polling of Blue Dog districts shows 54 percent support for the public option.

If nothing else, they need to realize that if healthcare fails, the damage it will do to the President will come back to bite their blue butts.

People are dying every day while Republicans and Blue Dogs drag their feet to oppose and delay the process.

Sad story -- A 22 y/o woman has died probably because she was uninsured and put off going to the doctor. Friends said Kimberly Young was worried about the cost. There are differing opinions about whether she died from the H1N1 flu, or viral pneumonia as a result of the flu.

And yes, this poor young woman might have died even if she had health insurance, but delaying medical care until she showed signs of kidney failure and dehydration certainly didn't help.

Nevertheless, it's a compelling example of the need to fix our broken healthcare system.

Late-night jokes round-up 9/27/09

Tags:
@ 09:14 AM (1 month, 25 days ago)

 

"Some good gossip. There's a new book out about Barack and Michelle Obama's marriage. And in it, they say that Michelle Obama was very upset by all these drooling blonds who would push up to her husband and rub themselves up against him. They said this. One blonde was especially suggestive and kept rubbing up against the President. And finally, Michelle said, 'Look, Chris Matthews, get away from my husband.'" --Jay Leno

"Hey, more problems for Democratic sleazeball, John Edwards. The campaign official who claims he fathered the child of Edwards' mistress is writing a book where he says Edwards is the real father. So, looks like USC wasn't the only one playing with bad Trojans." --Jay Leno

"No, according to The New York Times, a man named Andrew Young, who is a friend of Edwards, has submitted this book proposal where he reveals John Edwards is the father of the child he had with his mistress, Rielle Hunter. We have a copy of the book right here. It's called, 'Duh.'" --Jay Leno

"And how awful is this? This book claims that John Edwards tried to calm his mistress down by promising to marry her, after his wife died, in a rooftop wedding ceremony in New York with the Dave Matthews Band as their wedding band. Really, Dave Matthews at the wedding for these two? Wouldn't Cheap Trick be more appropriate?" --Jay Leno

"This is all just speculation, you know. We won't be certain that the baby belongs to John Edwards until we see how the child's hair responds to blow drying." --Jimmy Kimmel

"A pharmaceutical company is developing a microchip to be implanted in patients' shoulders that remind them to take their medication. That's just what crazy people on drugs need, right, a voice talking to them out of their shoulder?" --Jimmy Fallon

"Now this was momentous. President Obama brought together Israeli and Palestinian leaders, and it was awkward. And they stood there, and they stared at each other, and finally, after an uncomfortable period of time, they shook hands. It was like my wedding night." --David Letterman

"And then the Iranian dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gave a hate speech and I thought to myself, where's that 'you lie' guy when you need him?" --David Letterman

"Hey, listen to this. You know the former governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin? Boy, I know her. She's traveling all over the world now, speaking gigs. And she went to Hong Kong and gave a speech and people who heard the speech said it was articulate, it was well-prepared, it was compelling. It's a year late, but …" --David Letterman

"And if it was that good I'm thinking it must have been Tina Fey." --David Letterman

"They paid her $300,000 for the speech, the Chinese, $300,000 for the speech. I guess she apparently could see the cash from her house." --David Letterman

"In a new interview, conservative talk show host Glenn Beck called John McCain a 'weird progressive, like Teddy Roosevelt.' In response, McCain said, 'That's funny. That's what Teddy used to call me.'" --Conan O'Brien

"And Iranian leader Mahmoud I'm-a-nut-job, he's in New York this week. Boy, he's really grumpy. I guess the movie on the flight over from Iran was 'Schindler's List.' And he just didn't like that." --Jay Leno

"And Libyan leader Moammar Qaddafi-duck, this moron, was at the U.N. today. He talked forever. He talked on Israel and the swine flu and the JFK assassination. Where was Kanye West to grab the microphone away?" --Jay Leno

"Well, I'm sure you heard about this story. Officials have charged three men born in Afghanistan in this terror probe. An official says much of the evidence gathered was suggestive of a plot to attack buses or trains. How scary is that? Imagine terrorists being able to blow up an Amtrak train before it has a chance to run off the embankment on its own." --Jay Leno

"Anyway, this terror suspect who was arrested in Colorado that was charged with detailed plans on how to make the bomb - here's my favorite part. The guy said he downloaded the plans to make the bomb off the Internet by mistake. Oh, shut up, that's the porn excuse! Wives don't even buy that! Shut up!" --Jay Leno

"And according to a front page story in the LA Times, the CIA is deploying teams of spies, analysts, and paramilitary operatives to Afghanistan as part of a broad intelligence search. They said this should catch the Taliban by surprise, unless, of course, they happen to see the front page of the L.A. Times." --Jay Leno

"If you wanted to, you could get on the eBay and you could bid on having dinner with Sarah Palin. Did you know that? Yep, you could bid on it. And the winning bid was $63,000. You get to sit down and have dinner. Of course, you know, for that price - people say that's a lot of money - she'll shoot the main course." --David Letterman

"It's the most expensive date with a governor since Eliot Spritzer." --David Letterman

"Actually, did you see that Obama was on six different TV shows pitching his health-care plan. You know the difference between Obama and the ShamWow guy? You can see the ShamWow guy on Fox." --Jay Leno

2009/9/26

Curses! Foiled again!

Tags:
@ 07:54 AM (1 month, 26 days ago)

 

You know how rabid righties are always saying that President Obama is dedicated to the destruction of America? The teabaggers, Beck and Limbaugh have said he wants to imprison Christians in FEMA concentration camps, etc., etc.

Well, supposedly "respectable" conservatives think he's treasonous too. Get this parody of unhinged rightie hysterics from the National Review: "Is Obama Naïve?" by Michael Ledeen -- "I don't think so. I think that he rather likes tyrants and dislikes America.[..]"

Hmm, I wonder why, then, is the President giving the FBI free rein to bust up all these recent terror plots if he wants America destroyed?

And where did Dick Cheney duck? I miss his hunkered down snarl.

But then, Republicans aren't praising our FBI for their good work keeping America safe, they are barely mentioning it at all. It might draw attention to the fact that terrorists seem to have been thwarted on a Democrat's watch. Nothing to see here...move along.

Obama's administration broke up this plot, and notice how he doesn't take credit...or swagger and boast like a cowboy. Or whip up any fear...he was just quietly doing his job.

Here's how it went: First, the FBI disrupted a major Denver-based terror plot centered on Afghan immigrant Najibullah Zazi.

Next they conducted a sting operation that led to the arrest of a man charged with attempting to blow up a Dallas skyscraper.

Then they conducted another sting that led to the arrest of a Muslim convert in Illinois who was going to try to detonate what he believed was a bomb outside a federal courthouse.

These bad guys intended to do considerable harm!

It's taking some people a little while to get alarmed about all of this. I understand, because when those supposedly big-deal terrorist arrests -- Padilla, the Liberty City Six, the Lackawanna Six, etc. -- turned out to be...well, not much, a lot of people just became blase and skeptical. But it looks like this is the most serious terrorist case in years.

I salute the White House, the FBI and the New York City police department for a job well done...even though there's certainly more co-plotters still out there. I trust the FBI's excellent police work to eventually find these bad guys.

We should have lots of good information about Zazi’s confederates because our government has been tracking him for months. They've tapped his computer and his phones in Pakistan and the US....investigative gold. They'll know who he's been talking to about bomb-making, who shared information about how to make a bomb, and just generally who was making plans for a terrorist attack.

Righties on talk radio are saying we ought to torture Zazi for more information, but that would not only be immoral, but counterproductive. Looks like the feds have a good handle on everything.

Don't forget how they broke this case -- with good old-fashioned investigative work.

 

2009/9/25

Which is more bizarre?

Tags:
@ 09:22 AM (1 month, 27 days ago)

 

Gaddafi's United Nations speech on world peace, or Sarah Palin's Hong Kong speech on the world economy?

All you can say about Gaddafi is that he hadn't spoken to the United Nations General Assembly in 40 years, so he had saved up a lot of batshit crazy things to say...about everything from the assassination of JFK to 'fish flu' to jet lag. It ought to tell you something that his Libyan interpreter collapsed 75 minutes into the rambling.

I wonder if Gaddafi ever found a place to pitch his tent...

Palin didn't say anything about seeing China from her hotel room...but her speech stirred more American interest than Gaddafi's. Her fee for the Hong Kong appearance is said to be around $300,000. Which she needs to pay $500,000 in legal fees for all the ethics complaints filed against her as Alaska's governor. It should be said that most of them were dismissed, but there's still a couple of biggies not settled.

Please please please tell me that Palin's speech is the start of a Republican party grooming and make-over for her future presidential run...it would be a Democrat dream come true. Because guess who went with her? Randy Scheunemann, John McCain's former foreign policy adviser.

This time she read from a prepared speech, but written by experts (Bill Kristol?) and probably not her view nor her intellect. At least there was no silly rambling like the speech she wrote herself when she stepped down as governor...which sounded like Anna Nicole Smith on a drug binge.

Hopefully we will see a lot more of her in the future. Her wingnut visceral instincts are good, and she's very pretty...two assets that appeal to the hard right. Their new girlfriend is Carrie Prejean (anti-gay Miss California contestant), who spoke to wild applause at their recent Values Voter Summit.

Yep, charisma was good enough to get Palin to the Alaska state house, but she lacks the more important traits for electability -- brains and expertise. I mean, she thought Africa was a country! And she couldn't name one newspaper she read.

She needs some understanding of basic Civics, government structure and Law to appeal to America's moderates and independents. IF they can get past her membership in a truly nutty church with bizarre beliefs and practices...witch doctor exorcisms and all. 

The Republican party sure does come up with some doozies...makes you wonder what kind of places they crawl looking for their candidates.

2009/9/24

Way to go, Joe!

Tags:
@ 11:06 AM (1 month, 28 days ago)

 

One of my favorite conservatives, Joe Scarborough of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," told the New York Times, regarding hate-monger Glenn Beck and his minions:

"Then Mr. Scarborough lamented that Republican officials weren’t denouncing some of the wild, hate-filled claims being made in the protests and on the air. "We’re going to have a conservatives’ honor roll on this show…I’m talking to you, Mitt Romney and I’m talking about anyone who who wants to be president in 2012. … You need to call out this type of hatred." he said, because the inflammatory rhetoric would blow up in everyone’s face.

The talk show host berated Mr. Beck by name for several minutes as the archetype of a hate-preacher, contending that he couldn’t spread conspiracy theories around one minute and then the next just excuse his remarks as that of a "rodeo clown."

.....on his radio program, Mr. Beck responded to the MSNBC host’s remarks by calling him a "loser" who "couldn’t even be voted dogcatcher now." He defended his own views as political speech. [..]"

Thank you Joe, for asking Republicans to show some spine...to step forward to say that certain talk is hate-filled, or untruthful and unacceptable.

It's the only way the GOP can attract centrists, moderates and independents...the voters they need to win elections.

Why are the wingnut crazies being allowed to hijack the party? Why are they being allowed to be in control?

There’s a reason they’re called kool-aid drinkers...because Glenn Beck is slowly becoming their Jim Jones....

 

Census worker hanged, "Fed" scrawled on chest

Tags:
@ 07:52 AM (1 month, 28 days ago)

 

Better stay outta them Kentucky woods...lots of gub'ment hatin' goobers roamin' around...

Yeehaw Glenn and Rush...let's whip up some more anti-government hatred...who sez it has to lead to violence! Feeding into the paranoid fantasies of mentally unstable goobers is good for ratings!

From Associated Press: "MANCHESTER, Ky. – When Bill Sparkman told retired trooper Gilbert Acciardo that he was going door-to-door collecting census data in rural Kentucky, the former cop drew on years of experience for a warning: "Be careful."

The 51-year-old Sparkman was found this month hanged from a tree near a Kentucky cemetery with the word "fed" scrawled on his chest, a law enforcement official said Wednesday, and the FBI is investigating whether he was a victim of anti-government sentiment......

[T]he most deadly attack on federal workers came in 1995 when the federal building in Oklahoma City was devastated by a truck bomb, killing 168 and injuring more than 680. Timothy McVeigh, who was executed for the bombing, carried literature by ultra-right-wing, anti-government authors. [..] "

Just heard on TV that Sparkman's murder came on the same day that the House Republican Whip, Eric Cantor, said he thought House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lived in another world if she thought rowdy anti-health-reform, anti-government townhall meetings and protests could lead to violence.

2009/9/23

Is Afghanistan just Vietnam without the jungle?

 

As the national debate about sending more troops to Afghanistan heats up, President Obama has wisely called a time-out. He says he will not be rushed into a decision...that he needs more time to refine a strategy.

Yes, it would be wonderful if the Afghan government could control extremism and corruption while supporting human rights -- but maybe it's time to realize that those lofty goals are only fairy-tale-dreams.

We are at a Vietnam crossroad -- more money, more troops, more time, more new strategies, more money, more troops, another strategy...we can't leave now because the lives of all those dead kids would be wasted. So we waste more...and so it goes, round and round...

It looks like America is slowly withdrawing support. 

From MSNBC: "[t]he latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll finds that Americans are concerned about the progress of the conflict.....Nearly six in 10 say they’re less confident the war will come to a successful conclusion, and a narrow majority of respondents (51 percent) oppose sending more troops to Afghanistan......the public is split over whether the conflict there has been worth the costs and casualties.[..]"

There is a good reason that Afghanistan is called 'the graveyard of empires'...the British tried and failed, the Russians tried and failed, and I seem to remember the Greeks, Iranians and Buddhists before that. Shoot, we can go all the way back to Alexander the Great.

Before the smart ones high-tailed it, they left a warning for those tempted to make the same mistake:

"Now, it is not good for the Christian's health to hustle the Aryan brown,

For the Christian riles, and the Aryan smiles and he weareth the Christian down;

And the end of the fight is a tombstone white with the name of the late deceased,

And the epitaph clear:

"A Fool lies here,

who tried to hustle the East." [Rudyard Kipling, on the British defeat in Afghanistan]

And now, here comes the Americans. I've heard military experts say that we almost had a handle on Afghanistan early on...when we focused only on catching the thugs who were behind the 9/11 attack. We were demolishing al Qaeda training camps and had chased the Taliban off to Pakistan.  But then the Bush gang diverted troops, equipment and attention to Iraq....and it wasn't long before the insurgency in Afghanistan grew stronger.

Remembering the tragedy of Vietnam, and the tragedy of Iraq, I applaud President Obama as he thinks twice before sacrificing thousands more American lives and trillions more dollars on a corrupt Afghan government that can’t -- doesn’t even want to -- defend its own people.

I remember something GWBush said during his 2000 presidential campaign -- "America should never get involved in the nation-building business."

Next thing you know he's trying to rebuild two of the most dysfunctional nations on earth -- Iraq and Afghanistan. 'Regions' would actually be a better term, because they aren't nations, never were, and never will be. Imperial Britain drew borders around them and gave them names...but they are still medieval snake pits.

We Americans now have a window of opportunity opening just a crack and, if we're smart, we will make like a flock of homing pigeons and fly away.

We went into Afghanistan originally to chase down and kill or capture all the al Qaida thugs who organized 9/11. It's time we got back to doing just that...and leave the Afghans to stew in their own religiously poisoned, tribal juices. Obama's generals say the insurgency in Afghanistan is predominantly Afghan.

So we need to forget nation-building and go after al Qaida tooth and nail, and all the other terrorist groups that threaten us. We should fill their skies with armed drones and blow them up every time they step outside their caves and huts to even take a leak.

Of course, the corrupt governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan will have a fit...because they want us to keep sending them our kids and our billions of dollars instead.

Well, too damned bad.

We can't win in Afghanistan, no matter how long we stay there. So, instead of our kids dying as they try to herd cats, we'll just have to figure out another way to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of extremists.

How about a lot of good undercover police work?

2009/9/22

Obama on Letterman

Tags:
@ 09:39 AM (2 months, 14 hours ago)

 

President Obama is in NYC for the United Nations General Assembly, and wisely dropped in to appear on David Letterman's show last night. He did a great job.

BTW -- it was absolutely surreal hearing Paul Schaefer play “Hail to the Chief.”

Of course, some righties are griping that he cheapens the office of President by appearing on a popular TV show...especially Republican speech writer Peggy Noonan.

One thing for sure -- when conservatives do a lot of nit-pick complaining it only shows how effective Obama is.

How can anyone complain about a President who makes himself MORE accessible and accountable? Remember the last man to sit in the Oval Office...the one who was afraid of questions?

Yes, Obama had just made the rounds of the Sunday political talk shows, but the people who watch those are political junkies...wonks and nerds like me.

So, it was very smart of Obama to speak directly to the millions of average Americans who watch Letterman...mainstream people who maybe don’t go to town hall meetings with all the screaming teabaggers.

And, let's face it, most of the country isn’t interested in watching actual press conferences.

I think Obama finally realizes that the best way to counter the lies from the right is to take every opportunity to fight for his policies himself...not his staffers, or Senators, or even his wife, but himself.

The President's engaging personality and charisma are strong weapons against right-wing hysteria, and he needs to take every opportunity to get his message out...to go where the people are.

Besides, it's so refreshing to have a President who drops by a popular TV show to explain his viewpoints and ideas to the public...instead of one who hunkers down in the White House, keeping his ideas and decisions a secret.

I love the President's sense of humor. When Letterman asked him something about the recent criticism of his healthcare reform efforts being grounded in racism, Obama quipped, "I think it's important to realize that I was actually black before the election."

~~rim shot~~

Then he said something about the fact that he was elected in the first place tells us a lot about what's really happening in the country.

Thanks Mr. President, I need to be reminded of that - that the majority of the country voted *for* you. It's easy to lose sight of that because I live deep in redneck country, in a red state, and I hear not only whispered racist remarks, but also some that are bellowed outloud, disguised as so-called jokes...which are laughed at with glee. It's nice to be reminded that they are only a small part of the country.

But the Letterman appearance was not all jokes...Obama spoke about the economy (improving), employment (still lagging behind), Afghanistan (still deciding on a strategy before deciding to send more troops). An interesting thing he said about healthcare was how conservative governments around the globe are puzzled by our healthcare debate, because some of these countries are right-of-center - hardly “socialists” - but they can’t figure out what all the fuss is about here, why anyone in the US would oppose something as logical as national health care.

This President has such difficult tasks on his plate, but I still have faith in him. The economy's pulse is fluttering back to life, the healthcare system has been a disaster for decades and finally has a chance of improvement (even with Republicans doing everything in their power to kill the legislation), the two wars he inherited are finally getting the close analysis they never got under you-know-who...

Keep up the good work, Mr. President.

In case you missed it - here’s Obama’s appearance in video:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5328061n

2009/9/21

Journalism? Puh-leeze...


Fox News — or as I like to call it, RNN (Republican News Network) — promoted the 9/12 rightie protests in Washington for months. Day in and day out, urging their viewers to go to Mad Hatter Glenn Beck’s Tea Party on the Mall to show how angry they are about who’s in the…oops, sorry…what’s going on in the White House.

No surprise that when the big day finally came, Fox took it a step further. While Glenn Beck was babbling on with activist Griff Jenkins on camera, the crowd behind Jenkins was going wild, waving signs, screaming and cheering…Jenkins was saying how totally spontaneous and ‘grass roots’ it all is.

But what viewers didn’t see was a Fox producer waving her arms behind the scenes encouraging the crowds to get louder when the cameras started rolling.

Yes, plain as day, a producer with a phone to her ear, actively pumping up the crowd to get more drama going, directing them to make more noise for the cameras…as if it were all a big game show.

I thought I heard a chant during the last few seconds of the video — “Fox News Rocks! Fox News Rocks! Fox News Rocks!”

Then, when the YouTube vid made the rounds and they were called on it, a Fox spokesperson told the Huffington Post that the “employee is a young, relatively inexperienced associate producer who realizes she made a mistake and has been disciplined.”

I’ll just bet she was…

Here’s the video that viewers saw at home…without the cheerleading producer.

BTW — wonder why Beck didn’t go to his own rally? If he’d been there at that podium, he could’ve whipped that crowd into a bigger frenzy than that skinny lil’ ol’ girl.

Okay, next thing you know, Fox takes out a big ad in major newspapers, claiming that they were the only ones that covered Glenn Beck’s 9/12 Protest.

That’s just not true… even C-SPAN covered the dang thing…for hours.

Well, the big stations pushed back against the Fox ad. CNN’s Rick Sanchez did a great piece, flat out calling them liars…and CNN did a promo, challenging them.

BTW – Aren’t there consumer protection laws about how a corporation is technically not allowed to promote a candidate or a party? Because Fox is falsely advertising itself as a news station. It’s not…it’s a channel that promotes the GOP.

Next, we have the 9/12 crowd size war — fire marshals said about 70,000, Limbaugh said 2 million. Maybe he was looking at those wonderful pictures being emailed around of a million teabaggers crowding the National Mall. Ah, turns out those pictures are actually of the Million Man March of 1997….if you zoom in real close you’d see nothing but, ahem, colored people.

The latest: I just heard on TV that President Obama was catching flack from righties for not appearing on Fox during his Sunday media blitz. Really now. Why should he waste time, and dignity, on a network who just the week before organized a hate-fest against him? Who never shows his important speeches during prime time like the other networks do? FOX preaches to the choir…how many of them are going to listen to a word he says?

2009/9/20

The Czar Wars

Tags:
@ 08:46 PM (2 months, 2 days ago)

 

A down and dirty war...a take-no-prisoners, life or death, no-holds-barred war. Oh excuse me, that's not the Czar War I'm describing, it's the wingnut war being declared on President Obama.

The bitter losers of the right sure must have a lot of time on their hands. This czar silliness is just their latest strategy since the birth certificate thing is probably losing traction. Maybe the poor things are linking "czars" with "communists"...

Next week the outrage will be about First Dog Bo getting free government health care.

Don't hold your breath waiting for honest and moral GOP leadership to denounce this unhinged fringe that's taking control of their party...besides, they'd be trampled by Republicans who are running to catch up with Glenn Beck’s goofy crusade against Obama's policy "czars."

We all know that consistency is not a Republican strong suit, but this is just plain nutty. Even Richard Nixon had "czars," and their beloved Ronald Reagan appointed "czars." Wasn't Poppy Bush Reagan's drug czar? President Clinton appointed 10, and GWBush, who appointed 46, should be called the Czar czar...yet not a peep about any of this from the right.

Here is a partial list of the Bush administration's czar appointments: Afghanistan czar, AIDS czar, Drug czar, Faith-based czar, Intelligence czar, MidEast Peace Czar, Regulatory Czar, Science Czar, Sudan Czar, TARP/Bailout Czar, Terrorism Czar, and Weapons Czar, etc., etc., etc.

Hey, wasn't Karl Rove called Bush's Domestic Policy czar? The same Rove who blathers on FOX condemning Obama's czars? The biggest insult ever was when Rove was named the Hurricane Katrina Reconstruction czar.

Ah, but those messy ol' facts can be so inconvenient...taking the fun out of nasty attacks and pure political posturing.

Maybe the only difference between Obama and all those other Presidents is that the other Presidents who appointed czars were white. (I'm sorry Mr. President, I know you want us to stop talking about race.)

Anyway, President Obama addresses the czar issue here.

This latest dust-up has to be sparked by the resignation of green jobs czar Van Jones.

Now we're hearing screams from people who have extremely selective memories, about how Obama's sinister czar agenda threatens our very democracy.

Bill Bennett denounces government czars on his right-wing radio-talk show...and seems to have forgotten about his own role as a "drug czar" in the Reagan administration.

Besides, many of Obama's officials they're hollering about have been confirmed by the Senate...and many hold policy jobs that existed in previous Administrations.

Maybe we should change the term to manager, advisor or director?

So now we have Rep. Jack Kingston’s (R-Ga.) running to catch up with the wackos...trying to round up GOP support for his Czar Accountability and Reform Act of 2009.

Wonder where all this rightie outrage was when GWBush trashed the Constitution with his "signing statements"...saying he didn’t have to obey any laws that Congress passed. White House lawyers even said the President could do anything he wanted in a time of war.

Yep, GOP leadership was silent and didn't make a peep about "freedom and tyranny" just a short time ago.

I don't remember Glenn Beck protesting either....

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs fired back when he pointed out that the same Republicans now complaining about czars, pushed for more of them when there was a Republican in the White House.
 
Gibbs said Republicans didn’t say a thing when Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) pushed for a stronger Y2K czar, or when Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) called for a manufacturing czar.
 
He also brought up the funniest czar story of all -- how Randall Tobias, a Bush administration deputy secretary of State and "abstinence czar," had to resign after his name was discovered on a prostitution-services call list.

"You know, somebody referred to in the Bush administration as the abstinence czar was on the D.C. Madam's list," Gibbs said. "Now, did that violate the Constitution, or simply offend our sensibilities?"

You're growing on me, Bob.

The Party of "NO!"

Tags:
@ 11:44 AM (2 months, 2 days ago)

 

Seventy five years ago, Republicans fought tooth and nail against FDR and the Democrats as they were trying to set up a national safety net for our most vulnerable citizens -- the elderly. Those seniors who had built this nation with their own hands, their own sweat, and sometimes with their own lives. It was Social Security.

Today that same party of NO! still lives in the last century...still think the government has no obligation to those it governs. And they are fighting tooth and nail again against Obama and the Democrats as they try to provide affordable health insurance and medical care to all Americans.

So, let us consider two things -- what kind of country would we be living in today if those cold crusty backward Republicans had had their way? It would have meant no Social Security. And no Medicare. Talk about "pulling the plug on granny!"

Let's also please remember that if it had been up to the Republicans, not only would there not be any Social Security and Medicare, there would also be:

No to the 13th amendment, which ended slavery

No to Brown v. Board of Education/ integrated schools

No to interracial marriage

No to black combat troops

No to Civil Rights

No to women's rights, including the right to vote

No to rights for gay people

No to public Colleges and Universities

No to the 40-hour work week

No to paid vacations or paid sick leave

No to child labor laws

No to worker's compensation

No to workplace safety laws (i.e. OSHA)

No to a livable minimum wage

No to the Clean Water Act

No to strong regulation of the banking and securities industries

No to any environmental regulation with actual teeth

No to federal family planning funding at home or abroad

And I'm sure there are many more...

Now, let us also consider this:
From CNN: Nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year in large part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care, Harvard Medical School researchers found in an analysis released on Thursday. "We're losing more Americans every day because of inaction ... than drunk driving and homicide combined," said Dr. David Himmelstein, a co-author of the study. Overall, researchers said American adults age 64 and younger who lack health insurance have a 40 percent higher risk of death than those who have coverage."

2009/9/4

Maybe he should just read "My Pet Goat" instead

Tags:
@ 08:24 AM (2 months, 18 days ago)

 

Righties are still suffering from Slime Flu. I didn't think the hard-core right could get any more mean and crazy...like how could they heckle and boo a handicapped woman in a wheelchair? Here's the video.

But now the wingnuts have become downright unhinged because President Obama wants to do a televised back-to-school speech to America's school kids to encourage them to stay in school and get a good education.

Righties are having a spittle-flecked fit...accusing the White House of trying to "indoctrinate" America's children.

They're sending out 'official' paperwork to the teachers..."Parents, you MUST protect your children at all costs!"

Wouldn't you know that good ol' 'fair and balanced' Fox News is in the middle of it? Even promoting the idea of parents keeping their children home from school so they won't be able to hear the president's pro-education message.

Maybe the Republicans should be given a chance for rebuttal...so they can promote dropping out of school, etc....

Maybe it's time for a little history lesson....

ABC's Jake Tapper reports that President Reagan spoke to students on C-SPAN back in 1988, and during Q&A, he "talked about opposition to gun control and other issues." How's that for a little "indoctrination"?

But wait, here's a more recent example:

"And do you know what the administration is calling the "community service" organization the president wants kids to join? The "USA Freedom Corps"! That's right -- "Corps"! It's a civilian fascist army! You don't believe me? It's right there on the section of the White House Web site specifically dedicated to children!

No, wait -- it's on the archived Bush administration White House site for children.

It was Bush, so there was no indoctrination going on there, no sirree. Nor was there any indoctrination going when -- at a time when the White House was trying to brand Bush's foreign policy with the name "Freedom Agenda" -- the White House kids' site offered a "freedom timeline" that attempted to link the "American Response to Terrorism" to stories about U.S. history touchstones such as the Underground Railroad, the Statue of Liberty, the March of Dimes, and the Berlin Airlift."

Yeah, "Freedom Agenda"...talk about yer "indoctrination"!

No one had a spit-flecked fit over any of that...maybe because Bush was a Republican.

But if President Obama wants to deliver a stay-in-school message, it's outrageous abuse.

Folks, this goes beyond conservative/liberal or Democrat/Republican. It's a pure, deep-seated hatred of the President, and for Dems/libs in general.

By now it's obvious that wingnuts will take every opportunity to disparage and oppose President Obama...they will ridicule and attack every single thing he does. Every single thing. Remember how hysterical they got when he ordered a cheeseburger and asked for Dijon mustard instead of good ol' "American" mustard?

I don't know if it's because there's a Democrat in the White House...or a Black President.

At first I thought the hatred was personally directed at Obama -- and I'm sure there's some of that, look at all the racist jokes -- but anymore I'm wondering if it's just because there's ANY Democrat in the White House. That if it were Hillary, there would be a misogynist slant to the hate.

Right now the wingnuts have not only a Democrat, but a black one...so that's a two-fer.

Sane people can plainly see that this is an ongoing effort to de-legitimize Obama as President. They use classic Newt Gingrich tactics...starting with "not born here" rants, and socialist rants...then they went on to say that Obama is building concentration camps to lock up conservatives and Christians.

Not to mention the 'death panels' and pulling the plug on granny. You can be sure that more vile spew is yet to come. Count on it.

Republican leadership should be ashamed for not speaking up...but they're willing to go along with this strategy because it works with their base.

I feel nothing but contempt for them and the right-wing media -- Limbaugh, Beck -- for rousing fear and suspicion in the heartland; likening Obama's presidency to a sinister foreign takeover, calling him a Nazi, Communist, whatever. They subliminally encourage their wilder crazies to use violence.

This is only going to get worse, I'm afraid.

 

2009/9/2

Is that an iceberg I see ahead?

Tags:
@ 09:36 AM (2 months, 20 days ago)

 

Is it Healthcare Reform?

I do understand that overhauling the American healthcare system will probably be the most complex legislation in modern history...and maybe we are expecting way too much...way too soon.

Mr. President, you have done a lot of things that I'm happy with, and maybe I just don't understand your long game...but I'm not happy with how you're handling healthcare reform.

Please don't forget how many of us gave time, effort and hard-earned dollars in small donations to help elect you. Do not dismiss our concerns...we will not stand by quietly while you sell out to the highest bidder.

I have always found Bill Moyers to speak the absolute truth and be a very smart deep-thinking man. I've followed his TV programs and read his writings for years. He was on Bill Maher's HBO show the other night and I was saddened to hear what he had to say about how the Democratic Party is losing the healthcare debate.

"MOYERS: I don’t think the problem is the Republicans . . . .The problem is the Democratic Party. This is a party that has told its progressives -- who are the most outspoken champions of health care reform -- to sit down and shut up. That’s what Rahm Emanuel, the Chief of Staff at the White House, in effect told progressives who stood up as a unit in Congress and said: "no public insurance option, no health care reform."

And I think the reason for that is -- in the time since I was there, 40 years ago, the Democratic Party has become like the Republican Party, deeply influenced by corporate money. I think Rahm Emanuel, who is a clever politician, understands that the money for Obama’s re-election will come from the health care industry, from the drug industry, from Wall Street. And so he’s a corporate Democrat who is determined that there won’t be something in this legislation that will turn off these interests. . . .

Money in politics -- you’ve had in the last 30 years, money has flooded politics . .. the Supreme Court saying "money is free speech." It goes back to the efforts in the 19th Century to give corporations the right of personhood -- so if you as a citizen have the right to donate to campaigns, then so do corporations. Money has flowed in such a flood into both parties that the Democratic Party gets a lot of its support from the very interests that -- when the Republicans are in power -- financially support the Republicans.

You really have essentially -- except for the progressives on the left of the Democratic Party – you really have two corporate parties who in their own way and their own time are serving the interests of basically a narrow set of economic interests in the country ... these narrow interests seem to win, determine the outcomes, no matter how many Democrats are elected, no matter who has their hands on the levers of powers, these narrow interests determine the outcomes in Washington, even when they have to run roughshod over the interests of ordinary Americans. I’m sad to say that has happened to the Democratic Party.

I'd rather see Barack Obama go down fighting for vigorous strong principled public insurance, than to lose with a [corporate-dominated] bill . . . . the insurers are winning. Everyone already knows the White House has made a deal with the drug industry -- promising not to import cheaper drugs from Canada and Europe – promising not to use the government to negotiate for better prices -- that deal has been cut . . .

There’s this fear that Barack Obama will become the Grover Cleveland of this era – Grover Cleveland was a good man, but he became a conservative Democratic President because he didn’t fight the powerful interests – people say Obama should be FDR – I’d much rather see him be Theodore Roosevelt – Teddy Roosevelt loved to fight – … I think if Obama fought instead of really finessed it so much . . . I think it would change the atmosphere...[..]"

They showed the video of Obama PROMISING to get rid of lobbyists...and then the headlines about how Obama had worked out a deal with the drug companies.

It wasn't pretty.

Moyers also speaks about the ongoing escalation in Afghanistan. The entire discussion is about 30-min and really worth watching...you can see it here, here and here ...until HBO takes it away.

I'm sad to see what is happening to my Democratic Party...though I do understand the dirty game of politics. I understand how the president's handlers, like Rahm Emanual, feel they have an obligation to do whatever it takes to get their boss re-elected. Because they surely can't further the Democratic agenda if they lose the next election.

But I don't like it...I was hoping that Obama would bring more of a change.

What we have here is a Democratic Party that's torn between whether to stand for some kind of values and principles -- or go after enormous donations from corporate interests.

How sad that so many senators, especially the leadership, find it so difficult to simply do the right thing. Why can't they raise money from elsewhere? Insurance company money is blood money. Why can't they see that?

Polls show that the majority of Americans want a public option -- a chance to buy government healthcare insurance like Medicare. But private insurance company CEOs would not be very happy with the Democratic senators in their pockets if they vote for a public option.

The same CEOs who are given Christmas bonuses for letting people die.

2009/9/1

Grassley needs to be tossed out on his assley

Tags:
@ 08:47 AM (2 months, 21 days ago)

 

Dang, what a good ad..."Senator, whose side are you on?" When Iowa's Sen. Grassley turns on his TV this week he'll hear one of his constituents speak plainly and directly about healthcare. They couldn't have found a better person for the ad...solid citizen, an Army veteran who always voted for Republicans.

His name is Kevin Shilling and he asks his senator to not only support healthcare reform, but also to back <gasp> a public option. He says Iowans of both parties "want the public insurance option."

He said: "I voted for Senator Grassley in the past...but when Grassley takes over $2 million from the big health and insurance industries that oppose reform and then says he won't give Iowans the choice of a public option, I have to ask: Senator, whose side are you on?"

Here's the ad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8ezBSvJFsE&feature=player_embedded

I sure admire Shilling's guts...standing up and saying what needs to be said. I hope he has nothing to hide...because you just know that rabid righties like Limbaugh are diggin' for dirt on this guy.

My only criticism about the ad is that it doesn't explain clearly enough that the word option means choice. Townhall screamers have dirtied the phrase "public option"...the meaning is not registering with some people. They have forgotten the meaning of the word "option"...somehow believing that public option will be mandatory.

Maybe it should be phrased as -- "a government-run health insurance that Americans could buy." A choice...optional...NOT mandatory.

Or call it -- The Public Option vs NO Option.

Or -- Optional Enrollment in Medicare for All.

Senator Grassley has been exposed as a lying, bought-and-paid-for hypocrite -- almost three million dollars was his price.

The Des Moines Register reports on how much money Grassley gets from health industry interest groups:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090831/NEWS09/908310315

The ad is set to run 200 times in four Iowa markets, and 100 times in DC this week. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America says it is already generating enough donations to keep it going longer.

Are we holding our breath until Grassley is swayed enough to vote for a public option? Don't be silly. But the idea of public option could get less scary, maybe even more popular...

Also, remember that Grassley is afraid of a primary challenge from the right in 2010...anything that can make him look two-faced, mean-spirited and out-of-touch is a good thing.

Chances are, Kevin Shilling is bound to get Grassley's attention....even if the senator did make it very clear last week that he's inclined to listen to loud protesters...simply because they're loud protesters.

Here's more if you need it, a video...Rachel Maddow prominently featured Grassley on her show last night:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#32 635423

Rachel comments on how Grassley is now openly fund raising based on his efforts to stop HC reform. He bragged about helping to defeat "Obama-care" in a recent fundraising letter:

 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/grassleyfundraising.pdf

Not only did he stop negotiating in good faith, he's actually spreading lies about the bill.