They cut out most of his best stuff .. his best lines! Jon was O’Keefed .. now he knows how ACORN felt. But not to worry, "Gawker" has an excellent rundown of the key moments you missed if you just watched what Fox aired .. and it's far more entertaining and interesting than what actually made it onto the "no spin zone."
Here's Gawker's report about Fox News’ "fair and balanced" editing of the so-called throw-down between Stewart and O'Reilly -- "I’m Not Saying Your Mother’s A Whore: How Fox News Censored Jon Stewart vs. Bill O’Reilly" :
"Fox News has generously placed the full, unedited conversation between Bill O’Reilly and Jon Stewart online, so we can see precisely how unfairly and deviously Fox edited the interview in order to weaken Stewart’s case: A lot!
Last night on his show—Part Two of a ludicrously overhyped "faceoff" between O’Reilly and Stewart in which Stewart attempted, among other things, to present a critique of Fox as a fear-mongering GOP messaging operation—O’Reilly boasted that his edit of their 42-minute interview for broadcast was "a fair cut" and invited viewers to have a look at the unedited version online to judge for themselves: "Some of these idiots in the press who hate us, ‘O’Reilly cut the interview to make Stewart look’—OK, all of that is bull. It’s a fair cut. And then when you watch the cut and watch the whole interview you’ll see it."
So we took him up on the offer, and guess what? If by "fair cut" O’Reilly means "cut in a manner that left some of Stewart’s best lines, most effective arguments, and most convincing evidence out of the interview and hidden from the broadcast audience," then he’s absolutely right…
Fox News' cut of the following exchange has Bill-O scoring a minor point by mocking Stewart’s use of the word "cyclonic"...
O’REILLY: Cavuto sane?
STEWART: Being the thinnest kid at fat camp. So let’s just get that straight. Here is what Fox has done through their cyclonic, perpetual…
O’REILLY: We’re back to the cyclonic.
STEWART: Their cyclonic perpetual emotion machine that is a 24-hour a day, 7-day a week. They’ve taken reasonable concerns about this president and this economy and turned it into a full-fledged panic attack about the next coming of Chairman Mao. Explain to me why that is the narrative of your network?" [..]"
Here’s what Stewart actually said about Neil Cavuto’s constant carping about Obama being a Stalinist:
"I know what this is. I come from Jersey—it’s the same thing: "I’m not saying your mother’s a whore. I’m just saying she has sex for money. With people." [F]ox News used to be all about, you don’t criticize a president during wartime. It’s unacceptable, it’s treasonous, it gives aid and comfort to the enemy. All of a sudden, for some reason you can run out there and say, "Barack Obama is destroying the fabric of this country."
Thank you Jon! And thank you Gawker. Stewart does dismantle Bill-O .. it was a pleasure to see.
One should really read the whole thing .. those clips are worth watching in full. Gawker does a great job exposing Fox’s chop job on Stewart. There's also good stuff in Comments .. like this one from a Fox apologist who whines, "The rife condescension in this thread is exactly why more people watch Fox than the Big Three. ... Fox’s viewers watch Fox because it’s the one place in the MSM they don’t get called stupid all day long."
Come on, does he really think more people watch Fox "news" than "the big three"? Assuming he means ABC, CBS, NBC.
FNC got a huge ratings boost with Stewart on and pulled 1.5M viewers. "60 Minutes" gets 12M weekly.
As for nightly newscasts: NBC 9,370,000 .. ABC 8,560,000 .. CBS 6,160,000. Univision comes close to O’Reilly at 1.2M.
More people listen to "All Things Considered" on NPR than watch O’Reilly.
Here's the numbers : http://tvbythenumbers.com/
And it's not hard for me to believe that Fox News viewers get tired of being called stupid ...
It’s just sad that there are so many stupid people, and even sadder that they're proud of it .. they watch Fox because it validates their stupidity. Fox provides an easy way out for viewers who don't want to deal with any alternative views .. who don't want to think for themselves, and who love to share the hate.
In an ideal world, Roger Ailes would be exposed for the hatemonger he is.